Posts Tagged ‘movies’

YouTube movie rentals: Epic Fail

// February 5th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Movies:- It was a surprise for Google but not, probably, for inhabitants of the online P2P communities. Gargle’s foray in into the digital movie rental business fell flatter than a pancake. It’d linked itself to the Sundance Film Festival with five indie releases which were available online for 10 days, says the New York Times . Gargle’s GooTube has how many zillion viewers every day? But only 2,684 people figured $4 a pop was worth it to borrow one of the offerings, netting Gogle a princely $10,709. And 16 cents. “The odds are always stacked against independent film makers,” the story has spokesman Chris Dale stating. “Some of the films at Sundance may have been seen by a few hundred people, and the YouTube test may have allowed them to double their audience.” It is the season, spin, spin, spin ….. Or it could be that in these times of economic distress people just aren’t going to totally blow four bucks to rent a flick on Gargle’s YouTube. And maybe they never will, not with so very many alternatives, a significant number of them free, available. Time for Gargle to call in the Obama administration for a little help? Here’s the NYT’s breakdown > > > The Cove – 1,103 times Children of Invention – 490 times Bass Ackwards – 396 Homewrecker – 355 times One Too Many Mornings – 340 times The makers would’ve  got a whole lot more mileage online if they’d released their art on the P2P networks. At least that way more than just a relative handful of people would’ve seen them. But there’s still time … - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi New York Times – YouTube’s Take From Movie Rentals: $10,709.16, February 2, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

The 2010 Pirate Oscars

// February 5th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Movies:- It’s almost that time of year again, the time when Hollywood gets all dolled up to tell itself how wonderful it is. Oscar time, in other words. And it’s now also a tradition for Waxy.org ’s Andy Baio to publish statistics centering on “the eternal war between the MPAA and Internet movie pirates”. In 2009, of 26 nominated films, “an incredible 23 films are already available in DVD quality on nomination day, ripped either from the screeners or the retail DVDs,” he said, pointing out it was the highest percentage since he’d started tracking. But this year, “The tide may be turning,” says Baio. “There’s still a month out before the Academy Awards, but so far, fewer Oscar screeners leaked online this year — only 14 out of 34 nominated films, the lowest percentage ever. And they’re taking twice as long to leak — a median 21 days after theatrical release, up from 11 days the previous year,” he says, going on > > > It’s not limited to screeners, either. Camcorder and telesync releases dropped this year. Even the percentage of retail DVD rips has dropped, though this will likely shift before the broadcast. In the chart below, you can see the percentage of films that were released in each format. (For example, 21% of this year’s films had a cam release and 44% had a retail DVD leak.) And the R5 DVD releases that dominated previous year’s Oscars is now mostly dead. I’m guessing the studios are moving away from the early distribution of R5 DVDs entirely. Click here for the spreadsheet. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi Waxy.org – Pirating the 2010 Oscars, February 3, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Google hooks up with US spy agency

// February 5th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Politics | Advertising:- The arrogance which is giant US advertising company Google knows no bounds. It has its own political arm, it has minions carefully placed in middle and senior positions in the Obama administration, its executives routinely whine and I dine powerful political figures, it’s in the process of corralling the world’s books and now, “Google links up with US spy-master to thwart threats to cyberspace” as a Times Online headline sums it up. Thwarting threats to cyberspace? That looks dire. But it’s all about getting USA taxpayers involved in funding its continuing efforts against China, whose hackers recently (and effortlessly, with Microsoft’s help ) breached its security fences. Thanks to its pals in the US government, it’s felt free  to rope in  spy unit the National Security Agency for “technical assistance”. EPIC (The Electronic Privacy Information Center) has already filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the NSA for records on the relationship between the two. “The EPIC FOIA request also seeks NSA communications with Google regarding Google’s failure to encrypt Gmail and cloud computing services,” it says, pointing almost a year ago, it’d filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission urging it to “investigate the adequacy of Google’s cloud computing privacy and security safeguards”. Members of the NSA’s information assurance unit, aka The Blue Team, “went to Google at the company’s request several weeks ago to discuss details of the attack,” says Bloomberg News , quoting an anonymous source,  and going on: “The NSA plans to return to the company to continue to share information, the person said.” But so far, “the NSA hasn’t discovered much beyond what the Mountain View, California-based company’s own cyber-security officials had found”. Nor, apparently, is Gargoyle the only company US taxpayers are helping out via the NSA. “The NSA was responding to Google in much the same way it has to requests from other companies to look over the work they’ve done following a cyber attack, the person said, declining to name the other firms,” says the story. Says ConsumerWatchdog ’s John Simpson > > > NSA, of course, is the agency that taps all sorts of electronic communications around the globe. They’re also the outfit that broke the law and engaged in warrant-less interception of Americans’ phone calls and emails after the 9/11 terrorist attack. Cyber security is a huge issue that is downplayed by the online industry.  Google was right to go public when it was attacked, but the proposed Google-NSA deal raises huge concerns. Undoubtedly Googlers can learn something from NSA’s master-spy eavesdroppers, but how much of consumers’ data will Google share with the spy agency? So far Google and NSA aren’t commenting on the details of what’s under consideration. “It’s incumbent on both parties to be completely transparent about what kind of information is being shared,” says Simpson, adding: “Sadly, NSA has already demonstrated a willingness to flout the law. If Google wants to maintain any shred of trust from consumers it needs to do more that pledge, ‘privacy is important’ and fall back on the ‘Don’t be evil’ mantra. Tell us exactly what you’re doing with NSA’s cyber spies.” - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi Times Online – Google links up with US spy-master to thwart threats to cyberspace, February 5, 2010 EPIC – EPIC Seeks Records on Google-NSA Relationship, February 4, 2010 Microsoft’s help – Internet Explorer ‘vector’ in Google China attacks, January 15, 2010 Bloomberg News – Google Said to Seek Spy Agency’s Advice After Attack, February 4, 2010 ConsumerWatchdog – Google asking spy agency for help, February 4, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

BayTSP helps MPAA nail grandmother

// February 4th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view MPAA:- The major movie studios are having a bad time of it. Thrashed after trying to sue Australian ISP iiNet, they’ve also been ordered to pay an estimated 4 million dollars in costs. The money is no more than pocket change to the studios, which once again are reporting record revenues. But where will it end if courts persist in taking the side  innocent victims, like this US grandmother who’s decided she isn’t taking any  Hollywood bullshit? Now, “Take me off your hit list,” says Colorado artist Cathi ‘Cat’ Paradiso (right), as quoted by CNet News . “I have never downloaded a movie. Period … You’ll need to admit you made a mistake and move on to the correct perpetrator … I am saying this once more: My computer is not a toy. My livelihood depends on my ISP’s reliability. Look for the perpetrator and leave my service alone.” Fired up by Hollywood hit unit the MPAA, her ISP, Qwest Communications, cut her off the net, on which she depends for her living. She was accused of  illegally downloading 18 films and TV shows including Zombieland, Harry Potter and South Park, says the story. And there wasn’t a Three Strikes ‘graduated response’ law in sight. In fact, “One of the problems we’ve had with the whole ‘three strikes’ concept that would kick people off the internet due to accusations, not convictions, of file sharing, is the fact that we hear all the time about innocent users accused of file sharing “, says Techdirt . And “I’m the last person that would steal somebody’s art,” Paradiso states in the CNet story. “I’ve never downloaded a movie or song in my life. I’m against it. After going through this, I realize this is the kind of thing that could really hurt artists. I’m so paranoid now, I won’t buy music or movies online ever.” Says Techdirt, “We had not heard that Qwest had signed on with a ‘three strikes’ program, so it’s a bit of news that it’s one of the companies who will accept bogus accusations. Not only that, but Qwest even told her that no other provider would grant her service because Qwest would let those other service providers ‘know her name and what she did.’ Thanks, Qwest!” Enter BayTSP Qwest spokeswoman Monica Martinez “declined to specify exactly what occurred in Paradiso’s case, citing possible litigation,” says CNet, observing Paradiso “said she never received any e-mails or letters from Qwest notifying her of the problem”. She’s represented by Lory Lybeck, the lawyer who acts for Tanya Andersen, the Oregon mother falsely accused by the RIAA , the MPAA’s opposite number in the Land of Big Music, of illegal file sharing. Who’s behind the allegations? Online scalp hunter BayTSP. Do the companies that tracked file sharing back to Paradiso bear any responsibility for the mix-up? – CNet asked BayTSP boss Mark Ishikawa (right), His answer? “No.” Really? Would he be likely to say Yes? “Ishikawa notified Qwest that Paradiso’s IP address was being used to download ‘South Park’ and ‘Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,”‘ both owned by Viacom,” says the story, adding: “Ishikawa said that BayTSP has systems in place that do multiple checks to ensure that the people fingered for piracy are correctly identified. He added that mistakes are very rare and those wrongly accused represent only a tiny fraction of the people flagged for illegal file sharing.” Meanwhile, the only way Paradiso got Qwest to back down was to get the media interested but if she hadn’t been able to do that, “she would have had no recourse,” says Techdirt, continuing: “There was no one she could appeal to, and no official process to respond to the bogus claims of Hollywood. She got lucky that News.com was willing to pick up her story and contact Qwest, but what about anyone else threatened with bogus notices?” BayTSP, “whose ‘evidence’ has been shown to be flimsy and easily falsified in the past, stands by accusing her of file sharing, saying it was her own fault for having an open WiFi network, suggesting there’s something inherently wrong with sharing your WiFi” it says, adding: “Yes, the company stands by its false accusation. Nice company.” Stay tuned. (Cheers, Marc) - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi February, 2010 CNet News – Grandma endures wrongful ISP piracy suspension, February 1, 2010 accused of file sharing – ACS:Law-type scams ‘big business’, January 28, 2010 Techdirt – News.com Prevents Falsely Accused Grandmother Of Getting Kicked Off The Internet By The MPAA, February 1, 2010 falsely accused by the RIAA – RIAA: still harassing Tanya Andersen, February 13, 2009 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

iiNet gives AFACT a pounding!

// February 4th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Movies | P2P | Politics:- Australia has a lot in common with Britain. They’re both run by politicians who are firmly  in the pockets of the corporate entertainment industry, they both believe they have the right to decide what their citizens should see and hear, they’re both run by limp Labour governments which are on their way out —- —- and they’re both home to half-assed scam outfits called FACT, owned by ie, Disney, News Corp, Time Warner, Viacom, NBC Universal and Sony Pictures. FACT is short for Farcical Approaches to Copyright Transgressions and the Australian version has just taken another major shot in the teeth for its owners, the Hollywood studios (see above). As Andrew aka Comeoncomcast puts it > > > LOL … yes iiNet won!!! XD Now on to sue AFAIL for defamation, and damage of reputation and trademark!!!! :d Our picture shows an Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft spokesperson shortly after learning it hadn’t only lost its case, but also has to pay iiNet’s costs, estimated at $4 million. FACT, the Oz clone, has for months been trying to mince Australian ISP  iiNet on behalf of the Hollywood studios. But, “The giants of the film industry have lost their case against ISP iiNet in a landmark judgment handed down in the Federal Court today,” says the Sydney Morning Herald , going on > > > The decision had the potential to impact internet users and the internet industry profoundly as it sets a legal precedent surrounding how much ISPs are required to do to prevent customers from downloading movies and other content illegally. But after an on-and-off eight-week trial that examined whether iiNet authorised customers to download pirated movies, Justice Dennis Cowdroy found that the ISP was not liable for the downloading habits of its customers. In a summary of his 200-page judgment read out in court this morning, Justice Cowdroy said the evidence established that iiNet had done no more than to provide an internet service to its users. Says Canadian coyright expert Howard Knopf on Excess Copyright > > > In summary, in this proceeding, the key question is: Did iiNet authorise copyright infringement? The Court answers such question in the negative for three reasons: first because the copyright infringements occurred directly as a result of the use of the BitTorrent system, not the use of the internet, and the respondent did not create and does not control the BitTorrent system; second because the respondent did not have a relevant power to prevent those infringements occurring; and third because the respondent did not sanction, approve or countenance copyright infringement. I will now make my formal orders. For the reasons provided in the written judgment I make the following orders. The Amended Application be dismissed. Subject to Order 3 and 4, the Applicants pay the costs of the Respondent, including costs thrown away as a result of the Applicants’ abandoning the primary infringement claim against the Respondent. Any party or person applying for an order for costs different to that provided by Order 2 is to notify the Court within 14 days in which event Order 2 will be vacated and in lieu costs will be reserved. If any application for costs is made as provided in Order 3 the parties and/or persons are to consult and prepare consent directions for the filing of submissions and, if required, for a hearing on costs. Here’s the decision – which is 636 paragraphs in length and extremely detailed in its factual and legal analysis. It is worth noting that Justice Cowdroy issued this decision just 70 days – i.e. 10 weeks – after the conclusion of a hearing that lasted 16 days. And much of this period was the Christmas season. Michael Geist has quickly focused on the Judge’s disparaging remarks on “termination” of subscribers accounts, and how this would not be reasonable because it would prevent use of the internet for all sorts of non-infringing uses. Of course, the decision is mostly about “authorization”, which is a proverbially important topic in Commonwealth countries and very different in important ways from the American concept of contributory infringement or secondary liability. It is this latter concept plus the US Supreme Court’s “inducement” doctrine enunciated in Grokster + the US instigated three strikes policy that the US is trying to force upon Canada and ohter countries in every forum it can. “Authorization” was also a key issue in the Canadian Supreme Court’s landmark 2004 CCH decision. While this decision will make for wonderful reading for copyright aficionados everywhere, and much celebration by those who believe in reasonable, proportionate and effective remedies, there will also be another process starting immediately. This will entail the inevitable spin and propaganda that entertainment industry lobbyists will invoke as to how this decision clearly proves the need for a strong and mandatory “three strikes” mechanism and that ACTA is just the right forum to put it into place. “Today’s decision is very disappointing for the film industries who launched the case and for the 50,000 Australians who are employed in the Australian film industry,” said FACT’s Oz boss Neil Gane. Launched the case and for the 50,000 Australians who are employed in the Australian film industry? What a load of CRAP! FACT is also the outfit which claims one out of three Britons is a thief. Jon Newton - p2pnet - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi Sydney Morning Herald – iiNet slays Hollywood in landmark piracy case, February 4, 2010 out of three – FACT: a third of all Britons are online pirates, November 14, 2008 Excess Copyright – ISP beats Hollywood in Oz iiNet decision, February 3, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

2D Avatar pulled in China

// January 19th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

- Politics | Movies:- The state-run China Film Group “has instructed cinemas nationwide to stop showing the 2-D version of Avatar from January 23 on orders from Beijing’s propaganda chiefs,” according Hong Kong’s Apple Daily, quoted by Times Online . How come? Among other things,it might clash with a locally made flick  “loosely based” on the life of film being released Confucius, “including his supposed romantic attachment with a concubine,” says the story. “First released in Beijing on Jan. 14, it stars Chow Yun-Fat and was produced by Dadi Shidai Ltd,” it says. Not only but also, the authorities apparentlyhave two other reason. First, Avatar “has taken in too much money and has seized market share from domestic films, and second, it may lead audiences to think about forced removal, and may possibly incite violence,” says Times Online, going on > > > China’s favourite blogger, Han Han, a twentysomething writer and racing-car driver, was among those who quickly spotted the similarity between the film’s plot and real life. He wrote: “For audiences in other countries, such brutal eviction is something beyond their imagination. It could only take place on another planet — or in China.” Popular views of the film as an allegory for predatory property developers across China will not have gone down well with the Propaganda Department in Beijing. Blogs are buzzing with the news of Avatar’s imminent disappearance. Box-office takings “hit a record 56 million yuan for a single day and IMAX cinemas which show the full 3-D version are booked up for weeks,” it adds. (Cheers, Em) - … .. … and identi.ca More p2pnet music downloads – and stuff Times Online January, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Pedophile site violates privacy, says agency

// January 19th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

- P2P:- A website with the names, addresses, and personal identity numbers of people convicted of sex crimes involving children, has been reported to the police by Sweden’s Data Inspection Board (Datainspektionen – DI). Publishing the information violates Sweden’s Personal Data Act, says the agency. Additional data include details about the crimes , as well as the case numbers, says The Local . The site also allows users to locate offenders on a map of Sweden. “It’s a worrying development that more sites of this type are cropping up which clearly breach the the date protection act,” the story has DI head Göran Gräslund saying. “When sites like this expose people, it not only affects those who are singled out, but also affect their families and relatives,” said Gräslund. The operators aren’t named, but Gräslund “told the Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) newspaper that DI has evidence indicating that the site’s operators have IP-addresses registered in Sweden,” says The Local, adding > > > Back in March 2009, DI filed a similar complaint against kriminellt.com, a website which posts information about sex offenders run by the Original Gangsters criminal gang. The complaint came just one month after the agency reported a similar site, sexbrott.com (previously known as sexoffender.nu), which also published the names, personal identity numbers, addresses, convictions details and sentences of Swedish sex offenders. Gräslund told S vD that a police investigation into one of the sites was abandoned, but that the second investigation is ongoing. sexbrott.com is down, but kriminellt.com “remains up and running”, the story adds. - … .. … and identi.ca More p2pnet music downloads – and stuff The Local – Paedophile site reported for privacy violations, January 18, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Were ‘insiders’ part of China Google attack?

// January 19th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

- P2P | Advertising:- The Google vs China saga is rapidly becoming a farce with all kinds of weird and wonderful perambulations. Google says cyber attacks launched against it by China are forcing it to abandon censorship practices it’d reluctantly imposed in 2006. [Sidenote - actually, it was earler than that. It was censoring news within mainland China by excluding certain sites two years before, as p2pnet revealed .] Then Microsoft Security Advisory 979352 Released admitted, “we have determined that Internet Explorer was one of the vectors used in targeted and sophisticated attacks against Google and possibly other corporate networks.” To the delight of Google (and probably Firefox as well) Australia, France and Germany have as a result issued issued Internet Explorer warnings. Next up, Yahoo says it knew about the attacks all along but “chose to remain silent after its bigger rival went public”, says Reuters , going on: Then the Obama administratiojn decided it was time to help Google out with an official protest to the Chinese government”, said the Washington Post . “We will be issuing a formal demarche to the Chinese government in Beijing on this issue in the coming days, probably early next week,” it has state department spokesman P.J. Crowley saying. The diplomatic message will “express our concern for this incident” and seek an explanation, he said. Now, sources who are “familiar with the situation say the attck “may have been facilitated by people working in Google China’s office”, says Reuters , going on > > > Security analysts told Reuters the malicious software (malware) used in the Google attack was a modification of a Trojan called Hydraq. A Trojan is malware that, once inside a computer, allows someone unauthorized access. The sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itself, the analysts said. Local media, citing unnamed sources, reported that some Google China employees were denied access to internal networks after January 13, while some staff were put on leave and others transferred to different offices in Google’s Asia Pacific operations. Google said it would not comment on its business operations. Last week, “What’s really interesting about the Google vs China thing is not that it’s happening, it’s that anyone gives a damn, least of all China,” said p2pnet , adding: “Google is, after all, a huge American corporation that exists to make profits for its shareholders — nothing more — and anything and everything it does is subservient to that.” Stay tuned, of course. - … .. … and identi.ca More p2pnet music downloads – and stuff abandon censorship – Google to halt China censorship, January 12, 2010 p2pnet revealed – Google ‘Don’t be Evil’ amended, April 15, 2008 Internet Explorer warnings – Australia, France, Germany issue IE alerts, January 15, 2010 Reuters – Yahoo knew of attacks before Google, kept mum, January 15, 2010 Washington Post – U.S. plans to issue official protest to China over attack on Google, January 16, 2010 Reuters – Google probing possible inside help on attack, January 18, 2010 p2pnet – Google vs China: the Chinese view, January 186 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Johnny Depp and the letter ‘M’

// January 18th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

- Movies | Advertising:- Lewis Carroll’s book is generating a whole raft of industries aimed at people with lots of  spare cash. Tim Burton’s 3-D version of Alice in Wonderland is due out on March 5 but “instead of McDonald’s Happy Meal toys, there’s cool stuff for grown-ups by Stella McCartney, Sue Wong and Swarovski, which join jewelry designer Tom Binns in issuing ‘Wonderland’ pieces,” says the Los Angeles Times . Cool stuff for grown-ups, eh? Burton’s take “starts where the Lewis Carroll story left off,” says the post. Johnny Depp plays the Mad Hatter and “I started reading the book and understanding the character and the significance of the letter M,” he says in India Times Movies . “There’s a moment when he [the Mad Hatter]  says, ‘I’m investigating things that begin with the letter M’. “That was huge for me.” Says the LA Times: Stella McCartney necklace and bracelet … chain $425 and bracelet $395. Swarovski’s “Underland” collection of 17 jewelry pieces … cups, saucers, teapots, keys, talking flowers,  Cheshire Cat, $80 to $150. The Sue Wong Walt Disney collection includes baby-doll, empire waist and column dresses, $329 to $609. Got yer money ready? - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi Los Angeles Times – Stella McCartney, Sue Wong and Swarovski join Tom Binns with ‘Alice in Wonderland’ tie-ins, January 16, 2010 India Times Movies – Depp fascinated by his character in ‘Alice In Wonderland’, January 18, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

When 3D is 2D

// January 15th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

- | Movies:- Movies in 3D aren’t for everyone. Not, however, because they don’t like it. Explains catalogs.com > > > A polarizing filter in front of the left projector lens orients random light waves into one plane, while a different filter in front of the right projector lens orients light waves into a perpendicular plane . Filmgoers wear glasses with gray polarizing lenses that orient light waves in the same way as the filters on the projectors. This causes the viewer’s left eye to see only the image from the left projector and the viewer’s right eye to see only the image from the right projector. The brain receives these two separate images and fuses them into one 3-D image. But, “up to 56% of those 18 to 38 years of age have one or more problems with binocular vision and therefore could have difficulty seeing 3-D,” says a College of Optometrists in Vision Development press release , going on: “In addition, about five percent of the population have amblyopia (lazy eye) and/or strabismus (eye turn) which makes 3-D viewing impossible.” Not only but also, “Some people may have 3-D vision but feel nauseous or dizzy when watching Avatar,” states the college, saying this can be caused by ‘visual motion hypersensitivity’. But maybe there is a no-glasses solution. And it’s called Crosseyed Freeviewing. Yup. “If you cross your eyes to line up the images so that you see 3, the middle one will appear to have depth,” says the Kroden35 in a GooTube video. It takes a bit of doing, but it works. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi press release – Avatar 3-D Images Help to Identify Vision Problems, January 15, 2010 catalogs.com – How do 3D glasses work Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

« Older Entries


eXTReMe Tracker