Posts Tagged ‘silx’

Mozilla dropping 10.4 support with next Firefox release

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // Tech News

The next major release of Firefox will not be compatible with Macs running Mac OS X 10.4, also known as Tiger. This comes from a mozilla.dev.planing discussion on Google Groups started by Josh Aas, a Mozilla-employed developer working on the project. The change will go into effect later this year when the browser’s Gecko rendering engine makes the jump from 1.9.2 to 1.9.3. The Mozilla Foundation estimates that there are currently about 1.4 million Tiger users using Firefox 3.5 every day and approximately 36,000 using version 3.6. Those numbers total a little under 24 percent of daily Mac Firefox use. According to the discussion, Mozilla stopped supporting Tiger on mozilla-central, the most “cutting edge” repository, in September of 2009. Much of the old code was left, however, in case Mozilla had a change in heart. The decision means that the code specific to the old operating system will be removed soon, along with any hope of future 10.4 support. Users of the open source Web browser who are still using Tiger will be able to continue to use Firefox 3.6 for as long as they want, but the browser will stop receiving updates “several months” after the release of the next major update. This means that any security issues found in the browser after that date would be unlikely to be addressed by the team, and, in turn, left unpatched. Unsurprisingly, there is a vocal minority speaking out against the move. Individuals with older hardware are no doubt concerned that their old hardware will become even more obsolete and less usable as the rest of the world soldiers on. Mozilla isn’t concerned however, citing past data that shows no significant market share loss occurs after support for an older version of the Mac OS has been dropped. The company also claims that it usually supports older versions of Mac OS X longer than most companies. 

Microsoft: your battery is the problem, not Windows 7

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // Tech News

Last week , Microsoft said it was investigating issues in Windows 7 that affect batteries on certain notebooks after hundreds of users reported they thought the OS was to blame. Steven Sinofsky, president of the Windows and Windows Live Division, has posted a lengthy response on the Engineering Windows 7 blog. “At this time we have no reason to believe there is any issue related to Windows 7 in this context,” Sinofsky writes. Here’s his explanation: Several press articles this past week have drawn attention to blog and forum postings by users claiming Windows 7 is warning them to “consider replacing your battery” in systems which appeared to be operating satisfactorily before upgrading to Windows 7. These articles described posts in the support forums indicating that Windows 7 is not just warning users of failing batteries - as we designed Windows 7 to do this - but also implying Windows 7 is falsely reporting this situation or even worse, causing these batteries to fail. To the very best of the collective ecosystem knowledge, Windows 7 is correctly warning batteries that are in fact failing and Windows 7 is neither incorrectly reporting on battery status nor in any way whatsoever causing batteries to reach this state. In every case we have been able to identify the battery being reported on was in fact in need of recommended replacement. Sinofsky goes on to explain that PC batteries inherently degrade in their ability to hold a charge and provide power, and ultimately batteries must be replaced to restore an acceptable battery life (batteries usually have a warranty of 12 months). Windows 7 taps into a feature of modern laptop batteries which have circuitry and firmware that can report the overall health of the battery in Watt-hours power capacity. Windows 7 then calculates the percentage of degradation from the original design capacity; the threshold is set at 60 percent degradation, so if the battery is performing at 40 percent of its designed capacity then users will see Windows 7 report that it might be time to change the battery. Further, he notes that Windows 7’s new “Consider replacing your battery” message does not exist in Windows XP and Windows Vista, so many users would probably not have been aware of their batteries degrading. This would also explain why some users were seeing the battery indicator in Windows 7 builds prior to the RTM release while others only saw it in the RTM. Finally, Sinofsky asks users who believe they are receiving this error because their battery is new or in great shape to contact Microsoft via the TechNet forum , the Microsoft Answers forum , or to visit support.microsoft.com to find how to contact Microsoft assisted support in their region.

p2pnet World Headlines: Feb 8, 2010

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

More tainted milk found in latest crackdown China Daily More than 170 tons of milk powder have been recalled amid a 10-day nationwide crackdown on melamine-tainted dairy products, authorities have said. The recall is the latest of dairy products to resurface from a 2008 contamination scandal that hit the country. Two dairy companies in the Ningxia Hui autonomous region were closed for selling tainted milk powder on Saturday, while candies made with tainted milk powder were found in Jilin province yesterday. The two affected companies are the Ningxia Tiantian Dairy Co Ltd and Ningxia Panda Dairy Co Ltd, Ningxia’s regional government said in a press conference on Saturday. Ningxia police also found that another company outside the region paid the Ningxia Tiantian Dairy Co Ltd last July about 170 tons of milk powder – melamine-tainted products left over from the 2008 scandal that should have been destroyed – as debt payment. Google Spanner — instamatic redundancy for 10 million servers? The Register Google’s massively global infrastructure now employs a proprietary system that automatically moves and replicates loads between its mega data centers when traffic and hardware issues arise. The distributed technology was first hinted at — in classically coy Google fashion — during a conference this summer, and Google fellow Jeff Dean has now confirmed its existence in a presentation (PDF) delivered at a symposium earlier this month. The platform is known as Spanner. Dean’s presentation calls it a ’storage and computation system that spans all our data centers [and that] automatically moves and adds replicas of data and computation based on constraints and usage patterns.’ This includes constraints related to bandwidth, packet loss, power, resources, and ‘failure modes’. China to crack down on ‘thriving’ online gambling Xinhua China will conduct a nationwide crackdown on online gambling from February to August, an industry the country’s security ministry has described as “thriving.” According to a statement from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) released Monday, the campaign will target “major and severe cases, arrest domestic and foreign groups that organize online gambling and severely punish criminals.” The campaign will also focus on underground banks and third-party payment platforms that provide banking services for the gambling groups. Website operators offering connection to the services will also be targeted. Online gambling has caused large amounts of money to flow out of China and disturbed the country’s social and economic order, the statement said. The ministry said illegal online gambling has continued to thrive despite authorities’ crackdowns. Indie cinemas battle for Berlin’s spotlight The Local Indie cinemas are a dying breed the world over… except in Berlin, home to nearly 60 small arthouse and neighbourhood venues. The fight for survival is brutal. But as Exberliner magazine’s Alice Harrison reports, some of them are even getting the red carpet treatment at the Berlin International Film Festival. British Library to offer free ebook downloads Times Online More than 65,000 19th-century works of fiction from the British Library’s collection are to be made available for free downloads by the public from this spring. Owners of the Amazon Kindle, an ebook reader device, will be able to view well known works by writers such as Charles Dickens, Jane Austen and Thomas Hardy, as well as works by thousands of less famous authors. The library’s ebook publishing project, funded by Microsoft, the computer giant, is the latest move in the mounting online battle over the future of books. Symantec hit with class-action lawsuit over auto-renewals Computerworld A New York man has sued security software maker Symantec for automatically renewing his subscription to Norton Antivirus, alleging that the company did not notify him before charging $76 to his credit card. The lawsuit comes seven months after the New York Attorney General’s office fined Symantec $375,000 for the practice and ordered it to give notice before renewing any subscription. The Fight Over Who Sets Prices at the Online Mall New York Times On some pages of e-commerce sites selling products like televisions, digital cameras and jewelry, a critical piece of information is conspicuously missing: the price tag. To see how much these items cost, shoppers must add the merchandise to their shopping carts — in effect, taking it up to the virtual register for a price check. The missing prices are part of a larger battle sweeping the world of e-commerce. Wary of the Internet’s tendency to relentlessly drive down prices, major brands and manufacturers — and now, book publishers — are striking back, deploying a variety of tactics and tools to control how their products are presented and priced online. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi February, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

All that user-generated content? 95% is malware, spam

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // Tech News

The latest research from Websense Security Labs paints a dreary but familiar picture of the state of online security threats. Echoing the bad news of other such recent reports , it seems the vast majority of the Web consists of malware and spam. Worse yet, even legitimate, well-known sites are being used to pump malware, SEO poisoning, or phishing attacks. Websense uses a global network of systems to scan and analyze over 40 billion websites every hour, tracking malware and other unwanted content. The results for the latter half of 2009 show a 225 percent increase in malicious websites. Worse, 71 percent of websites found to contain some malicious code were in fact legitimate websites that had been compromised in some way.

2010 Superbowl: Megan Fox in a bathtub

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view P2P | Advertising:- “I wonder where Annie Leith (right) is today and what she thinks of her appearance?” – I said in p2pnet last summer. “Does she believe it was right for Apple and Pepsi to hold her and her friends up to be falsely accused by Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music’s RIAA as criminals in front of hundreds of millions of people in a warped iPod commercial?” – I asked, going on: “The iTunes /RIAA / Pepsi advertising connection has been forgotten by most people. But the RIAA is still trotting out kids and their parents as thieves. “And it’s still getting away with it.” The occasion was the 2004 Super Bowl and it’s that time again — but without the deeply perverted Apple – RIAA – Pepsi campaign. This time around, “YouTube delivered on its promise to upload all the Super Bowl Ads as soon as they aired today, with users voting to choose which one will grace the YouTube front page on Thursday,” says Mashable , adding: “The tech and web ads were a mixed bunch: Both the established GoDaddy ‘Too Hot for TV’ schtick and Motorola’s decision to put Megan Fox in a bathtub stuck to the ’sex sells’ mantra, while Monster.com returned with a ‘Fiddling Beaver.’ Intel went for a quirky ‘lunch room’ ad while Vizio chose star power in its Beyonce (beyonce) commercial. We don’t know what inspired Boost Mobile’s ad, meanwhile, but the humor appears to miss the mark.” Mashable has them all — except, for some reason, the beer ads. Not that it didn’t try. But “This video has ben removed by users”, say the GooTube embeds. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi p2pnet – Apple, Pepsi and the RIAA SuperBowl scandal, July 5, 2009 Mashable – Super Bowl Ads 2010, February 8, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Dell users’ victory

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view P2P:- In 2004, Ian Andrews purchased a Dell laptop computer for $1,700. About 2 1/2 years later, the computer began to malfunction, periodically shutting down unexpectedly. Stuck with a problem computer that was past the standard warranty period, Andrews complained to Dell. The computer giant responded that the online contract governing the initial purchase required him to resolve the dispute by arbitration. Andrews recognized this was not a realistic approach, later stating that, as a university student, he was not in a financial position to retain counsel to support an arbitration claim. Instead, he chose a different course of action, suing the company as part of a class-action lawsuit that brought together thousands of consumers experiencing similar problems. Dell challenged the class-action suit, but last month the Ontario Court of Appeal sided with Andrews, ruling that it could proceed. The case raised a wide range of legal issues, from the impartiality of the proposed arbitration provider (a U.S. firm that had ceased accepting new consumer arbitrations after allegations of “serious impropriety”) to the applicability of an Ontario consumer-protection statute. But the heart of the case was whether consumers can click away their class-action rights when they agree to online contracts mandating that disputes be resolved by arbitration. The use of such clauses has been commonplace among many businesses that are willing to trade the higher costs associated with a handful of individual arbitrations for the threat of a big payout in a class-action suit. From businesses’ perspective, the math makes sense: class actions hold the prospect of bringing together thousands of aggrieved consumers who may individually receive less, but collectively could cost the company far more. Although quite common, contracting out of class-action rights has long been a source of frustration for consumers and consumer advocates. Conventional contract analysis posits that businesses and consumers have an equal opportunity to negotiate a satisfactory contract. Yet, the practical reality is that online contracts are rarely, if ever, the product of actual negotiation. Rather, businesses present the lengthy terms and conditions – often buried behind a link or unreadable fine print – and consumers have little choice but to accept if they want the product or service. The Ontario government recognized the inequity of the business-consumer relationship in 2002, when it enacted the Consumer Protection Act, which outlawed mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts. The reasoning was simple: individual consumer disputes are rarely financially viable as independent legal actions and only make sense if aggregated as a class action. Applying the law to Andrews’ situation and those similarly facing the Dell arbitration clause, the unanimous court was clearly persuaded that arbitration was not an option, concluding “the choice is not between arbitration and class proceeding; the real choice is between clothing Dell with immunity from liability for defective goods sold to nonconsumers and giving those purchasers the same day in court afforded to consumers by way of the class proceeding.” This latest case represents a major win for Canadian consumer groups, who have tangled with Dell before in a case that ultimately went to the Supreme Court of Canada. Businesses operating online may understandably prefer to limit their likely liability through arbitration, but the resounding response from the Ontario legislature and courts indicates that it should not be possible to force consumers to click away their class-action rights. Michael Geist - Michael Geist’s Blog [Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist @ uottawa dot ca ] - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi February, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

The World According to Google

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view P2P | Advertising:- “Sometime in the middle of October, Google silently launched a new net domain — a barely-disguised doppelgänger to the familiar google.com — and according to the latest stats from the site watchers at Alexa, this mystery domain is now visited by nearly three per cent of all net users, making it the 44th most visited domain on the interwebs.” Yeh? Yup. “In other words, it’s bigger than AOL, Apple.com, or the BBC,” says The Register . By an amazing coincidence, almost exactly four years ago, “It seems Google, the world ’s largest advertising company, was “lusting for its own personal and private global internet,” said p2pnet , going on to quote Times Online as saying > > > “Last month, Google placed job advertisements in America and the British national press for ‘Strategic Negotiator candidates with experience in…identification, selection, and negotiation of dark fibre contracts both in metropolitan areas and over long distances as part of development of a global backbone network’. “Dark fibre is the remnants of late 1990s internet boom where American web companies laid down fibre optic cables in preparation for high speed internet delivery. Following the downturn in the technology sector during the early 2000s, the installation process for many of these networks was left incomplete. This has resulted in a usable network of cables spread across the United States that have never been switched on. By purchasing the dark fibre, Google would in effect be able to acquire a ready made internet network that they could control.” Google already owns a large telecom interconnection facility in New York and “it’s believed from there, ‘Google plans to link up and power the dark fibre system and turn it into a working internet network of its own’,” we said, adding: “It was also reported in November that Google was buying shipping containers and building data centres within them, possibly with the aim of using them at significant nodes within the worldwide cable network.” Sebastian Stadil, founder of the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group, note “1e100.net translates to ‘Google Network’ – the ever-growing Google private infrastructure that spans nearly forty custom-built data centers worldwide”, says The Register, adding:” “According to a recent company presentation, Google intends to expand this private interweb to between one million and 10 million servers, spanning ‘100s to 1000s’ of global locations.” ‘ … all that information could be made available to the authorities’ “If you’re worried about giant online advertising company Google getting your personal data,  you must be doing something you shouldn’t be doing, reckons Google boss Eric Schmidt,” said p2pnet a while back when Schmidt announced > > > If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines — including Google — do retain this information for some time and it’s important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities. Then we posted Part II of Google Sneak Views in which we point out your privacy is just another ‘product’ hook for Google. It’s scary, we went on,  and, “Am I the only one that’s not eating the ‘Google Red Pill’?” asked Gubatron.com , continuing > > > If you’re not scared it’s my intention to shake you up a little bit. Let’s see what Google has done and what it’s trying to do. Google controls over %70 of the Web Search Traffic, and over 57% of all advertising on the internet Google started as a Search company and they’re supposedly great at it (until someone else can show us better) so everyone uses their search and that means Google knows what everyone wants on the internet, therefore giving it one hell of an advantage over everyone else when it comes to decision making of any kind. What technologies to build, What websites are successful (which services should they buy or compete against). They know about all trends of all kinds. From lottery ticket search, to medicine search, to what new website is being searched for. Their great search capabilities made them hit gold when they started advertising next to search results. They made so much money that they were able to buy lots of ad networks including very powerful ones like DoubleClick ($3 billion, April 13 2007) which together with Adsense control 57% of the market share of Internet advertising. Just know that pretty much almost every ad printed on the web puts money in Google’s Pockets, the company that controls search. I wonder if their PageRank algorithm also includes the eCPM of the ads shown on the target sites, if not, it’s a direct consequence of being on the top search results that you’ll get more visitors thus making your CPM pay higher… it’s all a little fucked up the amount of control they have. And let’s not to forget that the little publisher on Adsense Gets Pwned with probably less than 10% of the cost of the click (Google gets $2 a click, you get less than $0.20 for that click), a percentage that is never shown to the publisher, a percentage that Google can adjust to their liking however they want. If you can sell your own ads, do so (and then tell me how). On top of that, there’s tons of money to make on statistics for all of that search data. You may want to read about a company called DemandMedia.com , in short they buy a lot of search engine data (probably Google’s included in there) so that they can generate a list of the things people want to know about every day, then they match that data to marketing databases (to see what the highest priced keywords are, data which may come from Google Adsense statistics) and they make a list of about 4,000 video titles, which they shoot and distribute EVERY SINGLE DAY. Internet Video YouTube… owned by Google, gets close to 100 million unique visitors every month. They’re the most influential video service on the internet. There are companies that exist and thrive (making millions a year) only because youtube is there (think again if you believe youtube is not making money). Oh and they know what you’re watching. Privacy Stuff Let’s forget about Search and Ad Monopoly, that’s their money maker, let’s start thinking about the creepier stuff, power. GMail alone as of July 2009 had an approximate of 146 million unique users during one month. That’s a lot of conversations being tracked in one way or the other. Can’t imagine all the money they make on Gmail alone, since it’s one of the applications that people keep open most of the day, and that’s a lot of contextual ads right there, plus a lot of tracking on clicks to external sites linked inside the emails you read. So they did Email great, you gotta give them that, but then they also have Groups, GTalk (instant messaging) and more recently they were talking about redefining email with Google Wave (which has been in my perspective a total failure, nobody is ever logged in or replying to the waves, it needs to integrate with email in order to replace it, maybe that’ll be the key and since they’re smart they should know this but they’re waiting for the right time…) This year Google has gotten super scary with all the announcements they’ve made, one of the scariest is Google Public DNS, the service that converts a domain name like “google.com”, into an IP address so that your computer can connect to it. Boasting on their excellence and good performance they’re trying to convince system administrators to switch over to Google Public DNS. What do we know if already our local ISPs have turned off their own DNS servers and just redirected all requests to 8.8.8.8 (Google’s DNS) to save on costs and to have one less thing to manage?. This is pretty scary because Google now would know where you go, even if you don’t use Google.com Another really scary thing is having this company also build for you the web browser. Not only they control all the traffic, but they want to control the application that you use to browse the web. They already own Firefox (a nice +$50 million dollar/year tax deduction) whose default search is, you guessed it… Google, and now they even want to make an Operating System that runs only their browser with the purpose of having you log in with your Google Account every time you turn on your computer (currently aimed at Netbooks, please install Ubuntu Netbook Remix and be safe) If their plans go accordingly, they’d be controlling everything, from every request that comes out of your internet connection (DNS), to the kernel and browser in your computer, to your email, to your documents (Google Apps), to where you go (Google Maps), to where you are (Google Latitude). And if that’s not enough, they want to give you a phone number (Google Voice) and transcribe your conversations and voice messages… but wait I forgot they’ve also built an operating system for your phone, Android, and next month they will sell their own phone. Are you scared yet? Other Services: Google Healthcare (They want your medical records too) Google URL Shortener (They want to track all the clicks inside Twitter and Facebook, they couldn’t let other companies deal with this, bit.ly FTW! ) Google Finance (They also know what stock quotes a lot of people are looking for) Google Reader (They know what news and feeds you’re reading) Google News (They want to control what news are read) Google Blogger (They know what you write about, and bank on you) Picassa (They want your pictures) Google Maps and Driving Directions on Android (They want to know where you’re going) Google Product Search (They wanna know what you’re shopping for) Google Checkout (Do they have your credit card number yet?) GMail (They know your contact list, who you talk to, who you do business with, what you want, what you hate, everything) And so many other scary things… they must be so pissed they don’t own Facebook. Way to go Mark. The scariest part however is that everyone is just looking at how convenient all this free services are, praising Google but not thinking if there’s a hidden agenda, it’s like nobody could ever suspect the real intentions. At least with Microsoft you knew what to expect. Doesn’t it all sound like an internet monopoly? It’s becoming impossible to compete with such a big monster… however like a friend said “History repeats, all Giants fall eventually” Google wants every byte coming in and out of you, they own every major piece of the action, it’s all becoming like big media and newspapers, like the food industry which is controlled by only a handful of corporations and we really have no choice in what we eat because everything is so cheap and convenient. Google at this pace will own the internet, or should we call it The Googlenet. By way of a kind of footnote, in Google Sneak Views: p2pnet, Part II, “Google used to be a ‘good beats evil’ business,” we quoted Umair Haque, director of the Havas Media Lab, in Harvard Business , as saying, going on: “But that was yesterday. Today, ‘increasingly, Google is an “evil subsidizes good” business,’ says  Haque. ‘It’s not so different from Coke. The historic, globe-spanning bad stuff Coke does — selling toxic sugar-water to kids and the poor — subsidizes a threadbare patch of good stuff: a handful of spare change for charitable giving and public partnerships. “Increasingly, the evil stuff Google does — supporting censorship , selling more and more toxic ads , squeezing suppliers and turning a blind eye — subsidizes a shrinking green patch of good stuff, like investing in the Mozilla Foundation.” Stay tuned. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi The Register – Google doppelgänger casts riddle over interwebs, February 8, 2010 p2pnet – Google wants its very own Net, February 3, 2006 Times Online – Rumours mount over Google’s internet plan, February 3, 2006 a while back – Only wrong-doers worry about online privacy, December 8, 2009 ‘product’ hook – Google Sneak Views: p2pnet, Part II, December 14, 2009 Gubatron.com – The Internet is becoming The Googlenet, December 14, 2009 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Welcome to the Monkey House

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Freedom | P2P:- The net can never have too much of blogs focusing on “the RIAA, the entertainment industry in general, and any other douche bags who think that suing people, disconnecting internet service, or other measures against file sharers is a good idea”. The words are p2pnet regular Monkey D. Luffy’s, and they appear on his new site — Monkey House , billed as the “ugliest p2p news site! Monkey says he was mulling over the shortager of dedicated pro-p2p news site so, “I decided to roll out Monkey House”, he says, going on > > > I figured considering how hostile the main stream media has been towards p2p, one more site representing the other side can’t be a bad thing. Nope. Can’t be bad. His first two post centre on Jammie Thomas-Rasset and ACTA. Good luck — and all the best, Monkey. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi February, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -

Microsoft loses ads on Facebook, expands Bing search deal

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // Tech News

Microsoft and Facebook have ended their advertising deal in which the software giant sold display ads on the social network, while at the same time expanding their search relationship. The announcement comes as a major Facebook redesign is being rolled out gradually to users. Microsoft will continue to sell search advertising for Facebook, but the social network will take over the selling of its own display advertisements in the US (it began taking over international sales in the last few months). Microsoft said this was a “mutual decision” since “it just made more sense” for Facebook to lead its own advertising strategy. Nevertheless, it’s hard to believe the company is happy about losing the advertising section of its partnership, although banner ads weren’t doing so well on the site anyway. In fact, Facebook stopped running traditional banner ads altogether when it launched the new design and instead is focusing on selling social campaign display ads. Meanwhile, Bing will continue to be the social network’s exclusive Web-search partner, and that exclusivity will soon go beyond US borders. Facebook users will also get access to more Bing search engine features, Microsoft said, describing it as “a more complete search experience” with “full access to great Bing features beyond a set of links.” Microsoft says users will see Bing updates to Facebook roll out over the coming weeks and months. Four months ago , Microsoft announced a global partnership with Facebook that would bring the social site’s status updates to Bing search results, and while the company touched upon that again, it did not give a specific date for when to expect those improvements.

Tim Hortons bans complaining coffee lover

// February 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // p2p

p2pnet view Off Topic:- Tim Hortons coffee outlets rule in Canada. Founded in 1964 in Hamilton, Ontario, the company merged with Wendy’s International in 1995, but its “biggest drawing card remains its legendary Tim Hortons coffee”, it boasts. However, decaffeinated coffee served at an outlet in St Andrews, New Brunswick, “was like brown, burnt water,” according to devotee Jimmy Craig. “I almost, you know, got sick in the sink”, the CBC has him saying. So Craig isn’t welcome there any more. He’s also been banned from the Tim Hortons in nearby St Stephen, says the story, going on, “Craig said he voiced his concerns to the store manager and corporate office, then got a meeting with the owner, Edwin Dow. “That’s when Dow served Craig with a letter banning him under the province’s trespass act.” Now, “he can only return to the Tim Hortons if he’s on the job as a paramedic, responding to a medical emergency”, the story adds. - … .. … and identi.ca More First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi CBC – Tim Hortons bans complaining customer, February 8, 2010 Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to - | | rss feed: http://-/feed -? -



eXTReMe Tracker